🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week following popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."